![]() |
|||||||
![]() |
Thirty Iranians (21 males and 9 females), with ages ranging from 11 to 75, took part in the study. They were given barium enemas and instructed to evacuate waste using two types of toilets:
Radiographs were taken when the subjects were having bowel movements in the squatting and sitting postures. All subjects gave feedback on their experience with both toilet postures. Using the radiographs, Dr Rad Saeed also took two other measurements:
SIDENOTE Dr Rad wrote about his findings in a report Impact of Ethnic Habits on Defecographic Measurements which was published in the Archives of Iranian Medicine (April 2002, Vol 5 No: 2, pg 115-117). The discoveries he made with regard to the connection between toilet posture and effectiveness of waste evacuation and pelvic floor health were astounding. The following extracts from his report clearly revealed the serious threat posed by sitting toilets… Effectiveness of Evacuation "Bowel evacuation was complete in subjects accustomed to the Iranian habit (squatting), but they reported incomplete evacuation using European-style (sitting) toilet." "They (subjects) also found that the ground-level Iranian style toilet more physically comfortable to use than the raised style." (On this point, Dr Rad was candid; he admitted that a significant limitation of the study was having to select individuals who are not accustomed to using the sitting toilet posture.) The Rectum and Anal Canal… "With the Iranian (squatting) method, puborectalis relaxation occurred easily and straightening of the rectum and anal canal facilitated evacuation." "By contrast, while using the European toilet, a
remarkable folding (bend) was created in the rectum
…and puborectalis relaxation was incomplete." SIDENOTE This
kink
can only be released in the squatting position. If it is not released, it is difficult to expel waste. (This explains why on a sitting toilet, a person is forced to strain for evacuation.) "The anorectal angle was much wider in subjects using the Iranian (squatting) method (average, 132 degrees) than the European one (average, 92 degrees)… sometimes, the angle disappeared entirely in the squatting position." Toilet Posture and Pelvic Floor Aside from the angle of the rectum and anal canal, Dr Rad also studied the radiographs and measured the position of the pelvic floor in both sitting and squatting positions. He found that in the sitting toilet posture, the pelvic floor was forced downwards to a significant degree… "The distance (ie: height of)... the pelvic floor was greater in the Iranian-style (squatting) toilet than the European one (8.4 cm vs 6.6 cm)."
The study revealed that the pelvic floor can sag by about 20% in the sitting toilet posture. The stretching extends to the pelvic nerves that pass through the pelvic floor. These nerves, when damaged by stretch injury, can result in loss of
bladder control,
prostate problems
and
sexual dysfunction.
Based on the results of his study, Dr Rad Saeed concluded that the use of the squat toilet "is a more comfortable and efficient method of bowel evacuation" than the sitting toilet. Actually this landmark study on toilet posture has done more than what Dr Rad originally intended.
By all accounts, things would get worse before it gets better…the sitting toilet is too well-entrenched in the West. It is also gaining widespread acceptance in many countries whose peoples have traditionally been squatting populations. In spite of the research work done by enlightened professionals like Dr Rad Saeed, there are virtually no campaigns…no crash programs…and no action plans by health authorities to educate men, women and children on the importance and need to adopt the correct toilet posture as intended by Nature -
squatting.
A growing epidemic of toilet-related ailments and diseases. Pain, suffering and misery for those who are afflicted... In his 1924 book Culture of The Abdomen, Dr William Welles did not minced his words when he wrote what he think of the sitting toilet:
[Source: William Welles, DC, 'The Importance of Squatting', Natural Health Society Journal, Penrith NSW]
Additional Reading
|
||||||